Sit down...have a drink...take a moment...take your lifetime...and think...

Thinking is good. One of the most obvious and important distinctions God put in place between us as mankind and all other life on this world is the ability to reason. I want to put my thoughts out in order to, hopefully, get you thinking, and perhaps even get your own thoughts. Be aware that I love debate, and if you want to intelligently discuss differences in thought, be they great or small, I would love to hear it! By no means do I know everything...but I seek to know and understand as much as I can...

06 October 2011

WWJV? (For Whom Would Jesus Vote?)


What if Jesus had came back in the recent past? Let’s say He did, but much like before: not in glory, but simply as a child who would grow up indistinguishable from anyone else on the street. Fast forward a year from now, and early November is less than a month away. For whom would Jesus vote? Would He vote? 

In scripture, the political scene was always following Christ around, but He never gave it much attention. Religious leaders tried to trap Him in politics (“Should we render unto Caesar?”), the government feared Him as a potential threat to the peace or even its own power (Herods massacre of infants and Pilate’s concerns at Jesus’ trial), and zealots wanted Him to strengthen their cause and drive out the Romans (He was constantly asked if and when He would drive out Rome and restore the glory of Israel). Despite pressure from all sides, Christ could not be pulled away from the Kingdom of Heaven. It’s safe to say He was worried about more important things.

Can we say the same of ourselves? Is church really church or is it a social club for people of the same political party and ideology?  Many churches feel like a pep rally for shared, ingrained beliefs (or voting patterns) rather than a place that challenges how people think and encourages mental or spiritual growth. We’ll comfort and encourage a man struggling with adultery, but Heaven forbid a liberal democrat should feel accepted in evangelical churches. A disturbingly large number of church-goers with whom I have spoken have difficulty describing a single catechism (or don’t even know what catechism is), but can rattle off dozens of reasons why they know Obama should not be president…which often leads to yet another person over-hearing and throwing in their own two-cents’ worth, yet not really saying anything different.

This problem isn’t just limited to the political spectrum either. A lot of churches seem to want someone or something to fight, as if it is them against the world, thus polarising an entire nation and alienating anyone and everyone of a different political or ideological background. In so many Christian circles the gospel of Christ’s love is all but replaced by the gospel of being right. 
 
The topic of the so-called “Culture War” is quite popular in such circles. As if to say that if someone isn’t a “right-wing evangelical,” then they must be actively fighting against evangelicalism. In my current environment (deployed over-seas in an infantry unit), I have access to a very wide variety of people who come from all sorts of backgrounds from all over the nation, from Jews to Muslims, and agnostics to atheists, so I decided to ask around to get an idea of what goes on in the minds of some on the other side of this “Culture War.” Oddly enough, hardly anyoneeven fellow Christianshad even heard of this war, much less knew that they were fighting it; in fact, only a single person was at all familiar with such a concept, and felt that such a war was a horrible waste, especially for people who should be concerned with loving as opposed to fighting. That no one was aware of such a war, or felt a need to be hostile or even overly defensive to evangelicals, seems to indicate that it is more likely our own little fantasy. Let’s be honest: it feels exciting to be actively working against something. It feels good to be right. It reaches to our competitive nature. It keeps us on our toes. It fuels books and debate. It makes for good television.

However, Christ didn’t command us to make good television…or to be right. He commanded us to put our investment and focus not in temporary politics or books that will get torn and faded, but in heaven where there is no rust or dust. I have never seen or heard of anyone who came to Christ through debate or argument, but I have heard of and witnessed people who could see Christ’s love in the actions and care demonstrated by His followers, which lead them to want to be a part of it. I am in no way saying to neglect the study of apologetics, or that it is unimportant to understand what we believe and why we believe it. I most whole-heartedly promote constant learning about our belief, but this is to protect our own faith, not to convince others that it is right. Liberal democrats and secular humanists are not the enemy, but rather, if anything, innocents whom Christ would liberate from the real enemy. Actions most certainly do speak louder than words. How can we expect to do anything to improve any earthly government for Christ if we neglect the Kingdom of Heaven in pursuit of one that will fade away? “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” -Ephesians 6:12

5 comments:

  1. Richard's comments: polarizing not polarising, per MS Word anyway, in third paragragh. Debate wise you say and ask good statements and questions. Though I did not feel a compelling reason to argue back. Is it a "Culture War" or a "Anti anything not my religion War"? Does politics belong in the "church"? If Christ did not think so why should I? Be safe!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. An interesting read. Avoid double negatives. I think most evangelicals get more caught up in churchology than culture. That is, why their particular denominational spin on things is correct. There is the real polarization. Imagine what "Christians" could accomplish if they could get beyond Methodist, Lutheran, Presbytarian, Assemblies etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It seems to me that "denomination" has been taking quite a beating in the popular culture these days. As a term, there is nothing inherently wrong with denominations. Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Assemblies, Baptists, etc. Are like different rooms of the same family home. "In my Father's house are many rooms..." The key is that we are in the same family! Heaven is the "Family Room" and the "Dining Room". Other rooms have more specific functions and unique decor. The most important rooms are the Family room & Dining room, as that is where the bulk of our fellowship and family interaction occurs. The Yard is where God's family intersects with the world and hopefully, they will see us all playing nicely together and having a great time, and we will all be congenial enough to invite them in to God's family. Only catch is, you have to enter by the Front Door (Jesus) and be married into the family. These are His rules, not mine. He died to win a Bride for Himself, so He gets to set the terms. Every human is welcome to join and will not be forced. But those those who refuse His offer will never be let in until they accept Him.
    We are OK with denominations of US currency - ones, fives, tens, twenties, and so forth. Different amounts, Same currency.
    As for the all-to-common problem of "ecclesiastical myopia" in churches, I think that is just a symptom inherent in all of us.We all prefer "our own kind", and it takes conscious effort to break out of our own cocoon to engage others not like us. So the myopia problem is a two-way street. Heaven forbid a conservative republican should feel accepted in a mainline church - while many of them might encourage homosexuality or abortion, and become belligerent, caustic, or hostile in their treatment of said conservative.
    Jesus said such polarization would occur between those who will follow His commands and those who do not. The key is that we remember that our task is to serve Him, love each other, love our "enemies", and seek to recruit them to His family, and not to annihilate them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A year ago I thought the analogy to currency, while clever, could possibly be opening a can of worms. Yes as "mainline" Christians we claim to accept all denominations. We even tolerate those we consider to be a little out there. No need to name them. But what happens when we start to travel? If we go far enough our denominations are no longer accepted. In fact, they have to be "converted". There are even factions that are trying to have our dollars replaced as the accepted currency for the worldwide oil trade. When this happens (doesn't prophecy proclaim it inevitable?), chaos ensues. Our financial system collapses and our Federal Reserve Notes are worthless. Arguably, they are worthless now but that's a different discussion. So where am I going with all of this? Religious polarization in the world trumps any denominational polarization or evangelical myopia here at home. We must, must put that behind us. Prophecy already fulfilled should serve to convince us of prophecy yet to come. Are we in the end times? I believe so. If we cannot come together and work together and prepare for the inevitable together, how will we ever work together when our very existence is at stake? And yet, even in our little city, denominational polarization, evangelical myopia and very possibly even the threat of stolen sheep keeps us behind the walls of our own little enclaves, unable or unwilling to come together and to fight our true common foe.

      Delete